Threads

Checking the checkers

When AI checks AI, what checks the checker?

guardrails · agentic review · fail-safe design · verification

Terms as of Oct 2026

Once AI writes code and copy faster than anyone can read it, tests, guards and reviewer agents carry the weight, and a check that quietly reports success is worse than having none. This thread is about building those checks, catching them passing when they shouldn't, and deciding which way each one should fail.

Start here: EXP-006 Fold's review panel

Patterns

  1. Never let the builder mark its own homework

    Each reviewer starts with a fresh context, so it hasn't absorbed the reasoning that produced the work and doesn't share its blind spots.

  2. Decide which way every check fails

    A check that crashes and reports "no errors" is worse than no check; when a check can't run, it should say "couldn't be checked", not pass.

  3. Make every check say what it didn't check

    A reviewer rewarded only for finding problems will find problems, so "nothing wrong" counts as a proper answer, and every report lists what it found sound and what it didn't look at.

Builds

Notes

All notes